I agree.
Ok, nice story, but whats embarrassing about it?
What a waste of space,and more to the point the last reply was right.What was embarrassing?
There is a statement on this page that reads: "... - please do not flame the confessors."
Apparently, this is not enough.
Should the webmaster of this site, therefore, read through all this material and delete those that seem to violate stated policy? Maybe so, maybe not.
It might be that the "please don't flame the confessors." is as much an 'advisory' as the "...adult audiences only."
There are already similar sites which only allow confessions.
There are similar sites which edit much more strictly than this one.
The one thing that stands out about this site is that it is NOT bland.
I think if you are looking for positivist therapy you are, currently anyway, in the wrong place.
Damm if I don't agree with everthing you said.
Not every negative response is a flame ... and not every flame is purely inflamatory. In other words, it can be a fine line. Plus, I keep my eyes out more for duplicates and violations of more important policies than I do for flames, admittedly. That being said, I do try to keep them from getting out of hand.
--The Webmaster